The Fake News Controversy is Larger than you Think.
Mainstream media, for many years has been able to control
the narrative and push their positions, and the government’s, which are, for
the most part, one and the same. Most of
the time a trusting public has been too busy trying to survive a weak economy,
so they have not figured out they are constantly fed distortions,
exaggerations, and sometimes outright likes. Cases in point follow. The US public bought into the government and
media narrative, that Iraq had WMD, and consequently made war on Iraq which
took at least a million lives for no legitimate reason. Many experts knew full
well that the intelligence had been altered and shaped to meet the need of the
media and government, but their voices were excluded from the debate by
mainstream media. In the same way, third parties have been excluded from
debates and exposure by mainstream media for years. Progressives such as
Dennis Kucinich were marginalized by the corporate media, and in the past
election, the voice of Jill Stein was muted by media.
The recent election, I suggest, overwhelmingly proves my
point. In the early days of the primary Donald
Trump was the media darling. His rivals cried foul because Trump was covered
24-7 by the corporate media, and rivals felt they could not compete with the
free publicity and exposure Trump was given. Indeed, FAIR, a reliable media watchdog,
calculated Trump received about 2 billion dollars’ worth of free air time,
proving the cry of foul by his rival’s to be legitimate. Media did not care;
Trump was so outlandish he was making money for the media moguls. At some point,
however, media realized they created a Frankenstein, and quickly reversed their
course. Trump instantly became the devil incarnate, and negative stories about
him and his candidacy prevailed. The
turning point developed when Trump announced he had no reason to fight Russia,
and saw no reason why we could not peacefully work with Russia, improving
relations for both countries, and therefore the world. Mainstream media, the
corporate pro war voice, could not take this kind of insolence. Their narrative
was Russia and Putin were a threat, and should be treated that way, so they
turned their pens and cameras on Trump and tried to bring him down. Media promotes
war. The New York Times with Judith Miller, helped lie us into a war with Iraq,
and has been pushing us into a confrontation with Russia, along with the
Washington Post. For two years, Russia
has been blamed for everything, despite the absence of proof for any of the
accusations. Russia had been thoroughly
demonized by the media in the same way that Manuel Noriega, Muammar Gaddafi, and
Saddam Hussein, had been demonized. The demonizing has proven itself to be
the first step in setting the stage for war, and it appears with the complete
vilification of Putin and Russia by corporate media, we are on the way to a war.
A horrible thought.
Meanwhile, Trump won the election. Hate him or like him,
give him credit for winning the election with the entire establishment against
him. His own party would not contribute
to his campaign, corporate media was solidly behind Hillary, and gave her a complete
pass on the content of damaging e-mails from within her campaign. Media chose
to gloss over the illegal Clinton team tactics of sabotaging Sanders, and focused
on those nasty Russians. Almost every major newspaper endorsed the Clinton
campaign, yet Trump prevailed. Corporate
media was truly shocked; not that Trump won, but because they had lost control.
They controlled the narrative, but lost
control of the voters. The voters voted the wrong way! Make no mistake; this
writer is not, nor will ever be, in the Trump camp, nor am I a Hillary
supporter. I did not have a dog in this fight, so I watched it as an outsider
or spectator, who saw things that others, who might have been emotionally
committed, did not see. It is clear that
media tried to promote Hillary, and was horrified that they had lost the ability
to control the narrative and the public.
The “fake news “controversy is nothing more than corporate
media’s attempt to slander alternative media, because corporate media finally
realized they lost control, and no one takes them seriously. By and large, people do not read newspapers,
nor do mainstream news outlets and cable news have any credibility. Corporate media
had to do something to regain control of the narrative, and they attempted to
do so with the fake news nonsense, and with the assistance of their gal Hillary
Clinton. They are trying to convince the public it is only they who can be
trusted. This is an effort to recapture
the public and regain control of the narrative.
They are frightened and shocked; for the first time they lost control of
the narrative. Their effort is akin to Chris Cuomo, CNN anchor, telling the US
public it was illegal for them to
read the contents of WikiLeaks e-mails, and that only news outlets were legally
able to read those e-mails. Cuomo
entreated the public to let CNN interpret the emails, and tell you what is
important. His amateurish attempt, made him a laughing stock. The fake news
controversy is Cuomo’s effort magnified tenfold. Trust us, and no one else, they suggest. Everything outside of corporate media is
“fake”, they insist.
How stupid does corporate media think we are??
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home